Top 10 “Real” Bible questions: #10 Age of Accountability

Posted: March 26, 2012 in Top 10 "Real" Bible Questions

Thank you Jesus, we are finally done with the Bible Urban Legend / Bible nerd questions!  Since I devoted so much time to those questions, I thought I should devote some time to a few “real” Bible questions.  I have already covered some issues that would have made the top 10 (God’s sovereignty and man’s free will, spiritual warfare, etc…), but there are tons of deep matters left.  I was thinking about avoiding some of these topics altogether out of the same basic instinct that says, “Don’t stick your foot in a bear trap.”  Unfortunately for you, I have never had much common sense with this kind of thing, so I will “boldly go where no intelligent Bible teacher should go”.  I will attempt to tread somewhat lightly and be as inductive as I can with presenting multiple views.  This isn’t being a “waffler” or a “ride the fence” kind of guy, but you must always decide for yourself what you believe.

“Real” Bible question #10:  the age of accountability (also related – infant baptism).  The more provocative title is, “Are babies born condemned to hell?”, but that sounds way too mean, so we will couch this as the age God holds people accountable for their sins.  As the doctrine of original sin developed, Christians in the early church had to wrestle with the ramifications of their views.  Those, like Augustine, who believed that original sin means that everyone is born condemned, struggled to explain to themselves and others how God could send young “innocents” to hell.  Several doctrines and practices sprung up from this including infant baptism, covenant theology, and the age of accountability teaching.

Infant baptism taught that babies could be baptized shortly after birth and that act would “cover” their sins until they could make their own decision for Christ.  How that actually works and the Scriptures to back it vary, although many of them explain how God’s grace works through the act of baptism.  Most stop short of saying that the infant is saved by the act of baptism, instead using it as a symbol of what God is extending to the infant.  I can find no Scriptural basis for this practice though.  You won’t find any commands in the epistles, nor stories in the narratives.  Only if you stretch Acts 16:15, and guess that there were infants who were baptized in Lydia’s “household”, could you come up with an example (very stretchy).  We see only adults baptized, and in Romans 6, Paul gives a symbolism which would only be understood by someone who has the ability to make the choice for Jesus.

Covenant theology states that the faith of the parents creates a “covenant” bond to God for the whole family.  The children are covered then by this covenant grace until they are old enough to make a decision on their own, or until they leave the “family”, meaning the household.  1 Corinthians 7:14 says, “For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy. ”  The terms Paul uses for the children are “unclean” and “holy”, not “saved” or “justified”.  For Paul, with a Jewish background and mindset, “clean” and “holy” have to do with a Levitical concept of clean and unclean from Leviticus 11 – 15.  This is not salvation discussed here, but ceremonial cleanliness.  Paul is speaking of believing spouses staying with unbelieving spouses for the sake of the children having a Christian authority and witness in the house (opening the way for them to be “clean” or “holy”, not necessitating it).

The age of accountability is a belief partially rooted in Jewish tradition (Bar Mitzveh) and backed by Isaiah 7.  Isaiah 7:14-16 states, “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.  He shall eat curds and honey when he knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good. For before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land whose two kings you dread will be deserted.”  In this passage predicting the Messiah Jesus, a time element is introduced to predict an event which will happen prior, the destruction of two enemy kings of Israel.  Though this does discuss a child’s ability to discern good from evil, it doesn’t address the issue of salvation or condemnation at all.  It doesn’t say that the child is not accountable before it knows how to discern good and evil.  (Not to mention the nightmare argument over whether this is speaking of Jesus or Isaiah’s son!)

So, if it seems that the age of accountability, covenant theology, and infant baptism are all on shaky ground, what can we say to comfort those who have had infants or children die?  I can propose two answers that have brought me comfort and seem to have merit.  First, though we may not have Scriptures to explain this, we do know God’s character and nature.  Passages that speak of God’s love for children and the helpless like James and Deuteronomy lead me to believe that God’s mercy would cover those not “old” or “aware” enough to make a logical/faith based decision for Christ.

Second, the principle of Ezekiel 18 is strong and needs to be considered when looking at Romans 5 and the doctrine of original sin.  God judges the individual and the corporate group, but the eternal judgment of heaven or hell seems to only expressed on an individual basis. If we say that infants are born condemned to hell, I know that we have reformed theology behind us solidly, but I am not sure we have the entirety of Scripture behind us on this.  We have to bring that doctrine together with the doctrine of God’s judgment as clearly expressed on an individual basis there in Ezekiel.  If an infant hasn’t sinned, can it be condemned?  Of course, that brings us to the question of how old is a child when it sins.  Having four children, I know it is a young age, and so it still leaves a wide gap until they are 13 years old (the supposed age of accountability).

Bible question #10, is there an age of accountability, has to be answered with a “no” from concrete Scriptural evidence, but gets a “yes” from me based on Ezekiel 18 and the character and nature of God.  That is the best I can offer for now.  As I shared in the posts on suffering, my wife and I lost our first baby, so this question is not merely an academic one for me.  Coming up next, Top “Real” Bible Question #9: Does the Bible support the death penalty?  I can feel the heat rising already in this highly contentious issue.  Remember, Jesus loves you…. and He loves me too.

Comments
  1. js6426's avatar js6426 says:

    I have a question that is only slightly related to this, and i’m really not sure that there is an answer in scripture but it is something that interests me and perhaps you have some thoughts.

    How do you think the dynamic of having babies in heaven will work? I am currently of the belief that God won’t be sending babies to hell, but I have absolutely no idea how a baby with no development would interact with others or worship God in heaven. It mystifies me completely as to what it will be like. Also ties in a little with the Matt 22:30 ref about not being taken in marriage in heaven (which I am looking forward to your teaching on in a couple of months!), does this mean we will no longer recognize our spouses (and children) in heaven? Or will we just be so blown away by the awesomeness of God’s presence that previous relationships will cease to matter (which seems unlikely because of God’s love of relationship)? Any thoughts?

    Jonny

  2. Sonny Huntsinger's avatar Sonny Huntsinger says:

    This is a hard one. I do not agree with all that infant baptism non-sense either. We have lost a couple ourselves and you wonder. Will i ever see them? We would like to think yes. May God have mercy on us all……

    • The Bible Nerd's avatar wordinasia says:

      Theology is always radically different when it is personal and practical like in this situation for you and I. I totally believe we will see them again, although I have many questions I am unsure of. Will they “grow up” in heaven or do they just instantly mature? That is a bigger question of how we will develop in heaven. We don’t age as normal, but there seems like there would some sort of progression. Katie and I have two kids that we will get to meet in heaven. I am stoked to see them one day.
      Sean

      • Sonny Huntsinger's avatar Sonny Huntsinger says:

        Yeah it will be pretty interesting to find out. It will be awesome to see them though.

  3. Mark Kubisch's avatar Mark Kubisch says:

    Sean, I too have lost a child. He was a full-term stillborn. I remember a verse in the Old Testament giving me hope. The verse is King David’s statement about his lost son with Bathsheba. Once the child died David said, “I will go to him, but he will not return to me.” (2 Samuel 12:23 NASB). How can David go to him if he is not in heaven? I hope I am reading this correctly.

    Mark

    • The Bible Nerd's avatar wordinasia says:

      Mark, I am so sorry that you guys had to suffer through this. I would agree with you in your interpretation of David’s reply. Some might say that David’s view of the afterlife wasn’t very clear from a NT point of view. In David’s writings, he only mentions “Sheol”, which in the OT refers to the place of the dead (for both good and bad people, much like Hades in the Greek view). Only in the NT, do we really see the revelation made known from Jesus that there is a heaven and a hell.
      However, I still agree with you and that while David knows he isn’t perfect, I don’t think he believes he is going to a place of eternal suffering, but rather a place with God. In this basic view, it is “heaven” as we know it today. I think the OT and NT both speak to God’s love and defense of the young and the innocent (children), that it is clear what His character and nature are.
      Again, I am sorry for your loss. No matter how much I study the Bible and time goes by, there is still a sadness in my heart over the child we lost. Each time I think about meeting our child in heaven it makes me excited though. Bless you guys, Sean.

  4. Basil McLaren's avatar Basil McLaren says:

    Hey Sean,

    First, thanks for doing this blog, it is interesting and helpful to hear your thoughts. Sometimes I wished we still lived close together so we could share fellowship in theological discussions.

    I do have a question for you regarding this topic. I have heard someone use this verse in Job 3:16-17 to say that an infant or still born child experiences peace and not evil because Job says he wishes he was like rather than experiencing the suffering of the world.

    Also, my own argument for the age of accountability would be from Rom 1 where Paul says people are judged based on the fact that “they know things” and rather than submitting to their knowledge of God they suppress it. So if you don’t have access to this knowledge that makes you accountable, you wouldn’t be held accountable. And we know that God is a just God in Rom 2:6 he renders each one according to his works.

    Just wondering what your thoughts on that would be.

    Cheers Basil

    • The Bible Nerd's avatar wordinasia says:

      Hey Basil! It is great to hear from you. I really miss our days with the SBS Reading Course. I learned so much meeting with you and enjoyed your friendship. Hope things are going well now. As to the passage in Job, it is hard to take direct teaching from Job due to the type of literature. With pessimistic wisdom literature, not everything stated is true. Job’s statements and especially those of his friends often contain incorrect thinking. God has to come in at the end of Job to provide correct answers (not that He really answers all the questions, but you get what I mean…) You can’t just take a passage in Job and say that because it is in the Bible, it is true. Job’s in the middle of a pity party in chapter 3 and simply is stating that he would be better off dead or dying at birth. This is not God’s heart for Job! It would be stretching for me to deduce that God is teaching us about the peace of infant or toddler death through Job’s complaints.
      As to the comments on the age of accountability, I agree that Romans 1 says that God bases judgment on knowledge, and he condemns the Gentiles based on knowledge from Creation, and doesn’t excuse them merely because they don’t have the specific revelation of the law. The question raised is whether we are “born in sin” and then God isn’t judging us for any specific action we do at all, but judges us corporately in Adam. The doctrine of original sin as put forth by Augustine and expounded on by several reformers was that we all “sinned in Adam” and therefore as our corporate head, he represented all mankind. The fact that we are born with a “broken relationship” with God (no indwelling of the Holy Spirit, sinful nature) would show that from birth, we are already under the curse of Adam and therefore judged even though we have no knowledge and haven’t even done anything good or bad (so age of accountability doesn’t matter at all).
      My problem with this is the same as what you stated. How does God judge individuals for eternity? Clearly God judges corporate groups with corporate, temporal judgment as evidenced by judgment on Judah, Israel, Assyria, etc… Individuals are caught in the consequences of a corporate judgment, even though they may be individually righteous (like Jeremiah for example). These are temporal (earthly) judgments though. How does God judge individuals for eternity? I would say that it is based on individual faith. Whole groups don’t get to go to heaven because one person believes. Ezekiel 18 is the ultimate chapter to me that would show God’s character and nature with individual judgment. So if you don’t go to heaven this way, would the opposite be true? you can go to hell due to someone else’s actions (Adam’s)? I don’t see that personally. Of course, because Adam sinned, we will all sin, and therefore go to hell unless we believe in Jesus. It is inevitable. However, I feel until you sin, there can’t be an individual, eternal judgment. When do you sin? That is the real question which makes the age of accountability relevant. Unfortunately, I just don’t see an age of accountability being supported by clear Scriptures in the Bible. We are left with reasoning out God’s character and nature and method of individual judgment in how it impacts young children’s deaths.

  5. gary's avatar gary says:

    The wages of sin is death ( Romans 6:23).

    The fact that children die shows that they are subject to sin just like adults. The Bible never mentions an age of accountability. Instead, it teaches that “the whole world (is) held accountable to God” (Romans 3:19), Psalms 51:5, Eph. 2:3.

    Gary
    Luther, Baptists, and Evangelicals

Leave a reply to js6426 Cancel reply